Layers and Layers of Security

Interactive Security Layers
🛡️

Layers and Layers of Security

Separating Myth from Reality in Defence-in-Depth

🛡️ By the Security Team / GABEY Consulting Australia | © 2025

Every organisation proudly declares it has “layers and layers of security.” The principle—Defence-in-Depth (DiD)—is sound, but poorly applied it creates fragility instead of resilience.

⚠️ 68%
of breaches bypass perimeter security
Click for details
⏰ 280
days average breach detection time
Click for details
👥 95%
of attacks involve human error
Click for details

📊 Interactive Security Assessment

1 tool10 tools20+ tools
SiloedModerateFully Integrated
Security Risk Level:
Moderate Risk

🎭 Interactive Myths vs. Realities

📚 More Tools = More Security?

Myth: DiD means buying one product per layer and ticking boxes.

🔍 Deep Dive Analysis:

The Reality: Unintegrated tools create silos and blind spots. True depth requires synergy—layers that complement, compensate, and communicate.

Key Problems with Tool Stacking:
  • Alert fatigue from multiple dashboards
  • Gaps in threat correlation
  • Increased operational complexity
  • Higher total cost of ownership
Better Approach:
  • Integrated security platforms
  • API-driven tool orchestration
  • Single pane of glass monitoring
  • Automated response workflows

🛡️ Perimeter Security is Enough?

Myth: Secure the gateway, and the job is done.

🔍 Modern Attack Patterns:

The Reality: 70% of successful attacks bypass perimeter defenses through social engineering, insider threats, or supply chain compromises.

Traditional Approach:
Castle & moat mentality
Zero-Trust Model:
Never trust, always verify

🚀 Ready to Transform Your Security?

Transform Defence-in-Depth from a façade into a sustainable shield with NOMATEQ™ and GABEY Consulting Australia.